Defend Thyself

Well you can forget about anything to protect your from crime in Korea , except chop sticks. Seems like any aerosal propelled pepper sprays are illegal. All you get is a manual pump bottle that might spray a couple feet. Might as well just fill it with wasabe.

Unauthorized Online Sales of Self-Defense Tools Rise

Online sales of unauthorized pepper spray and other self-defense items have recently jumped amid the increasing crime rate.

The unauthorized possession of such “illegal weapons” is subject to up to 10 years in prison or a 20 million won ($14,000) fine, police said Tuesday.

Seven-hundred and seventy cans of pepper spray made in the United States were sold through an online auction site here. They look like ordinary pepper spray but used compressed air, classifying them as gas guns requiring police authorization for possession and trade. They can spray pepper up to three meters until their contents are depleted.

Mmmmm, 9-10 feet, not very far. Sounds like a key chain pepper spray like the Wildfire 18 Percent Pepper Spray. Wildfire is in a small container that uses compressed air to hurl the spray about 9-10 feet, enough to keep a punk at bay.

We like the Wildfire 18 Percent Pepper Spray as it will bring the pain to any punk that try’s to spoil your day, and if you live in the USA, we can ship it to most states and the police won’t hassle you for it because luckily, we are allowed to defend ourselves here, unlike people in the rest of the world who can’t.

Find out more information on Wildfire Pepper Spray and the rest of our Self Defense Products at our online Self Defense Superstore…

Defend Thyself!

Sparky the Stun Gun
Self Defense Products Expert
DefendThyself.com/WildfirePepperSpray

The Mayor & Council of Washington D.C. continue their attempt to ban handguns. These idiots just don’t get it.

They are now saying the ban will be in effect everywhere except the home. You still have to register them and there will be books of regulations on how to store them.

“We continue to take every step we can to minimize handgun violence in the District,” said Mayor Fenty. “We must prevent handguns from falling into the wrong hands or being misused, while allowing District residents to exercise their Second Amendment rights under the Heller ruling.”

The proposed legislation has four main components:

1. Continues to ban handguns in most places but creates an exception for self-defense in the home. The handgun ban remains in effect, except for use in self-defense within the home. Sawed-off shotguns, machine guns and short-barreled rifles are still prohibited.

2. Requires the Metropolitan Police Department to perform ballistic testing on handguns and makes such testing a registration requirement. The Chief of Police will require ballistics tests of any handgun submitted for registration to determine if it is stolen or has been used in a crime. Also, to serve as many residents as possible, the Chief will limit registrations to one handgun per person for the first 90 days after the legislation becomes law.

3. Clarifies the safe-storage and trigger-lock requirements. The legislation modifies existing law to clarify that firearms in the home must be stored unloaded and either disassembled secured with a trigger lock, gun safe, or similar device. An exception is made for a firearm while it is being used against reasonably perceived threat of immediate harm to a person within

Because they are so concerned with guns getting into the wrong hands, they will punish everyone to go after the few. We look forward to this pathetic law being struck down also.

Neither am I happy about the Supreme Court Justices who barely affirmed the Constitution means what it says. They seem to feel the US Government was created to regulate us to death, which is the exact opposite of why the US Govt. was created.

While I can’t sell you guns, I can sure as heck show you some non-lethal guns; Stun Guns!

How about a blast from my friend, Big Daddy, the Stun Master 775,00 Volt Stun Gun. The Stun Master 775,000 volt stun gun is big and beefy, the choice of our security guard clients.

What we like about it is the wrist strap; if the Stun Master stun gun is taken from you, the pin will pull out, disabling the stun gun.

In the heat of the moment, you don’t want to end up being the victim; you want to be victorious. Until the end of July 2008, we will include FREE batteries (a $10 value), in addition to a FREE Pepper Shot Pepper Spray (a $9.99 value) with every Stun Master 775,00 Volt Stun Gun.

Defend Thyself!

Sparky the Stun Gun
Self Defense Expert
DefendThyself.com/StunMaster775

When, we are relieved to hear that a majority of our Supreme court justices feel the Constitution means what it says. In an incredible 5-4 ruling, 4 judges actually disented & felt we don’t have a right to keep & bear arms???

What country are we in? This ain’t X (enter any other country in the world), we actually have a right to defend ourselves from enemies, foreign & domestic.

One comment sticks out like a neon light:

In a dissent he summarized from the bench, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority “would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons.”

Me thinks Stevens forgot We the people created the elected officials, and elected them. We elected them to represent us, not repress us. Not to be our kings collecting their binding yolk and subjecting us to a life of serfdom. NO! We put the son’s of bitches there to help us.

And me also thinks Scalia sorta forgets the same thing,

Although an individual now has a constitutional right to own guns, that new right is not unlimited, wrote Scalia, a hunter.

Uhhh, didn’t we as people have that right way before the Constitution was ever drafted? So when did we loose that right that has now lovingly been bestowed back on us?

Though it appears at least one of them realizes reality,

In dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote, “The decision threatens to throw into doubt the constitutionality of gun laws throughout the United States.”

Now they are screwing us and it’s about time someone bitch slapped Congress with their repressive laws!

We applaud the justices who agreed: Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.

We loathe the dissenting traitors: Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and David Souter.

Comments?

Sparky the Stun Gun
Self Defense Expert
DefendThyself.com

In the race for the best Socialism money can buy, you might have missed this little gem. I had started to write about it over a month ago, and well, you know how it is, the most important stuff needs to get done. I have been mostly working on loading up a new shopping cart for our sister site, EyeSpyPro.com & setting up some other credit related ventures.

I already wrote about how Mr. Obama plans to lead us into “sensible gun registration”, and while the guy seems really sincere & honest, he is a card carrying member of the CFR, a globalist, and is so far left he touches McCain.

Now we see legislative garbage like that that expands the millions we give away to fight poverty, to the BILLIONS, UP TO 0.7% of GDP. Obama is the biggest asshat on earth! I am really sick of hearing Socialists wanting to give trillions away to the poor. Start by giving away all your money, selling all your possessions, and then I might give a few bucks…

Obama’s Global Tax Proposal Up for Senate Vote

If you are a Democrat, I really don’t mean to slag on you, it’s just that I wonder how anyone could approve of his direction based on where he has traveled from. Politicians dont’ change, except I see Bob Barr appears to have in several directions, which I’ll talk about later…

This blog discusses this in further detail:
More on Barack Obama’s S.2433 : Global Poverty Act

We know for a fact that this bill will cost America $845 billion above and beyond what America already spends on global aid in the next thirteen years. America will be locked in to giving .7 percent of the U.S. gross national product. That in itself is scary enough, but there is way more to Obama’s bill. It also locks us into United Nations Millennium Summit. Cliff Kincaid from Accuracy in Media is all over this bill. He writes-(Underlined by me)

The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending.

“It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day,” a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said.

Specifically, it would “declare” that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is “required” to “develop and implement” a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be “specific and measurable.”

Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as “official development assistance.“

We see it’s being held up in the Senate:

Conservatives Place Hold on Obama’s Global Poverty Bill

(CNSNews.com) – Two conservative members of the U.S. Senate have anonymously placed a hold on Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) global poverty bill, Cybercast News Service has learned.

The effort is an attempt to slow down the progress of a bill (S. 2433) that conservative analysts say could eventually force the U.S. to increase its foreign aid by hundreds of billions of dollars.

Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media, a conservative media watchdog, said S. 2433 has been getting “a pass” from Congress. It received absolutely no scrutiny in the House last fall, when it was passed on a voice vote, and no scrutiny last week in the Senate, when the Foreign Relations Committee also passed it on a voice vote.

“They never held any hearings on this bill in either body – none whatsoever,” said Kincaid. “They never heard from people like me, who monitor the U.N. for a living, about what was in it and what it means. You can be sure that people in the foreign aid lobby completely understand what’s in it.”

The current status is Apr 24, 2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 718.

Here are the 15 Senatorial slimeballs, besides the slimeball that wrote this piece of crap, including the biggest slimeball of all, Diane Frankenfeinstein, who’s pockets are lined with all the special interests she & her husband take money from. I though Chris Dodd was on our side? So much for lip flapping by politicians during election cycles…

Cosponsors [as of 2008-05-04]
Sen. Joseph Biden [D-DE]
Sen. Maria Cantwell [D-WA]
Sen. Christopher Dodd [D-CT]
Sen. Richard Durbin [D-IL]
Sen. Russell Feingold [D-WI]
Sen. Dianne Feinstein [D-CA]
Sen. Charles Hagel [R-NE]
Sen. Thomas Harkin [D-IA]
Sen. Tim Johnson [D-SD]
Sen. John Kerry [D-MA]
Sen. Richard Lugar [R-IN]
Sen. Robert Menéndez [D-NJ]
Sen. Patty Murray [D-WA]
Sen. Gordon Smith [R-OR]
Sen. Olympia Snowe [R-ME]

Then, there is some group called Bread for the World & Bread for the World Institute that is suggesting we call our representatives and tell them we support billions and billions of our dollars going to feed the world, while I can hardly pay my rent?

Bread for the world, such a sweet name; Screw you, Bread For The World! Headquartered in DC, these slimeballs must be a UN group that set up shop here to suck off Uncle Sams teats, and suck they will, billions of dollars sucked out of our economy to feed the world.

Now I am not a cold-hearted SOB most of the time, only some of the time, though I’ll be dammed if we are going to start sending 0.7% of our GDP to Africa to have corrupt dictators steal all the damn money anyway makes no sense to me…

How about you? Comments?

Christopher Winkler
Self Defense Products Expert
DefendThyself.com

Geez, I start a nice little blog to to bring you interesting news about self defense, and show you some of the non-lethal products that can protect you, if you can’t or don’t want to use a gun. Now the more I look for news, the more I am finding all this crazy stuff like the U.N. wanting to remove all guns from citizens because it is the “right” of a government to do that…

And when I go and read a forum called thinkfree be free, that linked to the article, I poke around and start reading up on the subject of Death Camps in North America, dozens of them. What the ???

Civilian Inmate Labor Program

Headquarters
Department of the Army
Washington, DC
14 January 2005 *Army Regulation 210–35
Effective 14 February 2005
1–1. Purpose
This regulation provides Army policy and guidance for establishing civilian inmate labor programs and civilian prison camps on Army installations. Sources of civilian inmate labor are limited to on– and off–post Federal corrections facilities, State and/or local corrections facilities operating from on–post prison camps pursuant to leases under Section 2667, Title 10, United States Code (10 USC 2667), and off–post State corrections facilities participating in the demonstration project authorized under Section 1065, Public Law (PL) 103–337. Otherwise, State and/or local inmate labor from off–post corrections facilities is currently excluded from this program. The Civilian Inmate Labor Program, official US Government plan to create slave-labor camps’

Here is another article. While this is 2 years ago, I never heard about it and these laws have not gone away.

10-Year U.S. Strategic Plan For Detention Camps Revives Proposals From Oliver North
The Halliburton subsidiary KBR (formerly Brown and Root) announced on Jan. 24 that it had been awarded a $385 million contingency contract by the Department of Homeland Security to build detention camps. Two weeks later, on Feb. 6, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced that the Fiscal Year 2007 federal budget would allocate over $400 million to add 6,700 additional detention beds (an increase of 32 percent over 2006). This $400 million allocation is more than a four-fold increase over the FY 2006 budget, which provided only $90 million for the same purpose.

Finally, we leave you with this blog, that links to a Market Watch article and an Army publication on the subject

Secret Prisons? Army Civilian Inmate Labor Programs? USA???

But don’t take MY word for it…follow the links to an article from Market Watch and a PDF file right off the Army’s website…thanks to TruthOut.org for bringing this to my attention.

KBR GETS CONTRACTS TO BUILD PRISON CAMPS (Jan 06)

ARMY CIVILIAN INMATE LABOR PROGRAM REGS (Jan 05)

That evidence paints a pretty clear picture that Michael Chertoff and the rest of Homeland Security really was not set up to protect us from enemies without, they were set up to paint anyone they want into the enemy from within and wisk them away, never to be heard of again, just like we did to the Japanese.

Isn’t this the kind of stuff that went on during WWII? Work camps set up to put the Jews and dissidents to work for the Reich, to save it money on labor costs so they can buy more bombs? Hmmm, incompetent government agency running these camps with massive people milling around, kind of makes me think of what happened in New Orleans during the hurricane.

Are we destined to repeat history, or do something about it.

Comments?

Christopher Winkler
Self Defense Products Expert
DefendThyself.com

I had 2nd thoughts of posting this, then I read over @ Democrat = Socialist the same subject, that this guy is the worst possible person who could be our President, as he will grab your guns under U.N. Programs already in place. More proof this empty suit is not person we need to lead us, because its apparent that Obama will goose step us into a “Constitutional” gun registration program that is the first step in a grab for your guns.

Then I found this little gem about Hussein Obama:

Obama’s International Socialist Connections
Campaign workers for Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama are under fire for displaying a flag featuring communist hero Che Guevara. But Obama has his own controversial socialist connections. He is, in fact, an associate of a Chicago-based Marxist group with access to millions of labor union dollars and connections to expert political consultants, including a convicted swindler.

Obama’s socialist backing goes back at least to 1996, when he received the endorsement of the Chicago branch of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) for an Illinois state senate seat. Later, the Chicago DSA newsletter reported that Obama, as a state senator, showed up to eulogize Saul Mendelson, one of the “champions” of “Chicago’s democratic left” and a long-time socialist activist. Obama’s stint as a “community organizer” in Chicago has gotten some attention, but his relationship with the DSA socialists, who groomed and backed him, has been generally ignored.

Jacob Sullem pens a great piece on Reasononline.com

Isn’t Self-Defense Common Sense?
Barack Obama’s Second Amendment is all about hunting and target shooting.

Under the Second Amendment, Barack Obama says, “There is an individual right to bear arms, but it is subject to common-sense regulation, just like most of our rights are subject to common-sense regulation.” The leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination thus seems to be on the same wavelength as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which in a decision last March said “the protections of the Second Amendment are subject to the same sort of reasonable restrictions that have been recognized as limiting, for instance, the First Amendment.”

But there is a crucial difference between these superficially similar formulations: The appeals court meant what it said, and Obama doesn’t. Although the Illinois senator has learned to pay lip service to the Second Amendment, the details of his past and present positions on gun control suggest he neither understands nor respects the right to keep and bear arms.

In last year’s ruling, which the U.S. Supreme Court will soon review, the D.C. Circuit overturned a Washington, D.C., gun law that bans possession of handguns in the home and requires that rifles and shotguns be kept “unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock.” The law thereby effectively bars city residents from using firearms for self-defense in their own homes.

Obama evidently considers that de facto prohibition a “common-sense regulation,” since he recently cited Washington’s law as an example of constitutionally permissible gun control. “The notion that somehow local jurisdictions can’t initiate gun safety laws to deal with gangbangers and random shootings on the street isn’t borne out by our Constitution,” he said.

And this emptiest suit ever made was a Constitutional lawyer??? What Constitution was he a layer for, and why does it even need a lawyer? It’s pretty clear what it says and that’s the problem with things now adays; people believe it’s up to interpretation. He does have a track record of voting for bans, restrictions, and regulations on gun ownership. What makes anyone think he will do anything different once he is firmly in place for the next four years?

Hey Obama, what don’t you understand about the right of the people to keep and bear Arms? Just another reason to not vote for this clown.

You obviously forgot that the first Ten Amendments to the Constitition “all relate to limiting the power of the federal government. They were added in response to criticisms of the Constitution by the state ratification conventions and by prominent individuals such as Thomas Jefferson (who was not a delegate to the Constitutional Convention). These critics argued that without further restraints, the strong central government would become tyrannical. The amendments were proposed by Congress as part of a block of twelve in September 1789. By December 1791 a sufficient number of states had ratified ten of the twelve proposals, and the Bill of Rights became part of the Constitution.

It is commonly understood that the Bill of Rights was not originally intended to apply to the states, though except where amendments refer specifically to the Federal Government or a branch thereof (as in the first amendment, under which some states in the early years of the nation officially established a religion), there is no such delineation in the text itself (wikipedia.org).”

Then I went to look Obama’s Web site, and he does has a link for “sportsman” with a section for “protecting gun rights.” It only talks about hunting. It does not talk about protecting yourself from criminals, and that the police won’t be there, so you are pretty much on your own, and oh yeah, we we want to regulate your Constitutional rights. When asked about his view on the Second Amendment, Obama has said, “There is individual right to bear arms, but it is subject to common sense regulation, just like most of our rights are subject to common sense regulation.”

What planet is this clown from? Anyone who would ever vote for this guy is a traitor to the Constitution. None of our rights are suppose to be regulated, we are suppose to regulate you and if you guys dont’ wake up and start making a stink about this, it’s going to be too late and all you will have to defend yourself with will be Pepper Shot Pepper Sprays and Stun Master Stun Guns.

While I base my business on providing self defense devices, they really won’t work against a gun. I firmly believe gun ownership is a God given right, and right to defend ourselves against criminals, foreign or domestic, and, as my friend Thomas Jefferson said, The only defense against a tyrannical government is an armed citizen.

Comments? Does anyone care??? Pick up your pepper sprays & stun guns today, as you might not be able to own a gun in the near future…

Christopher Winkler
Provider of Self Defense Products
DefendThyself.com

This article gives us another reason (like we need one?) to get as many guns and bullets as you can and tuck them away for a rainy day.

It seems the FBI has developed a secretive snitch network called InfraGard, which is made up of large corporations, bankers, utility companies; mainly companies that maintain or own the infrastructure of the country. It also includes 350 of the Fortune 500.

The FBI Deputizes Business
Today, more than 23,000 representatives of private industry are working quietly with the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security. The members of this rapidly growing group, called InfraGard, receive secret warnings of terrorist threats before the public does—and, at least on one occasion, before elected officials. In return, they provide information to the government, which alarms the ACLU. But there may be more to it than that. One business executive, who showed me his InfraGard card, told me they have permission to “shoot to kill” in the event of martial law.

Shoot to kill? Us? Martial law? Why on earth would we ever need that to come up? I don’t think the Founders of our country ever intended it’s little baby, the Republic to have the capability to change into a tyrannical government. While the people have slept for 150 years, things have slowly changed and we no are longer living in the land of the free. You did read the Martial Law Survival Guide over @ The Bacon Report?

This secret network is closed to us, the People who created the FBI in the first place. Well, we didn’t create the FBI, we created a Government that is suppose to serve us & it created the FBI.

Their website, www.infragard.net, looks innocent enough:

BECOME A MEMBER OF INFRAGARD

The benefits of joining InfraGard include:

Network with other companies that help maintain our national infrastructure. Quick Fact: 350 of our nation’s Fortune 500 have a representative in InfraGard.

Gain access to an FBI secure communication network complete with VPN encrypted website, webmail, listservs, message boards and much more.

Learn time-sensitive, infrastructure related security information from government sources such as DHS and the FBI.

Get invitations and discounts to important training seminars and conferences.
Best of all, there is no cost to join InfraGard

Now we have a Government that spys on us and makes us feel like criminals. I am sure AT&T is a member of this elite group, see a couple of our prior blog posts over @ the EyeSpyPro Spy & Surveillance Blog posts 38, 47, 67, 74.

This is an ultra elite group which you can only be invited to. Sorry, you, Joe Six-pack are not important enough to belong.

You won’t get the daily briefings on their secret, encrityped network:

The InfraGard website advertises this. In its list of benefits of joining InfraGard, it states: “Gain access to an FBI secure communication network complete with VPN encrypted website, webmail, listservs, message boards, and much more.”

InfraGard members receive “almost daily updates” on threats “emanating from both domestic sources and overseas,” Hershman says.

“We get very easy access to secure information that only goes to InfraGard members,” Schneck says. “People are happy to be in the know.”

People? Which people? Not us serf people, not me. I am not happy when I read stuff like this. I don’t know who to believe regarding 9/11 & the bogus wars on everything imaginable. I tend to not believe the official version of things and rely on other sources.

While on the surface, under all this war on terror rhetoric, this appears to be a good thing by making sure any wacko does not go and shut down the power grid or throw ricine in the water, it appears when they say they can shoot to kill, that to me is where I draw the line. When they enlist companies like AT&T to snoop on us and turn it over to the Government to hurt us, that is where I draw the line.

Where do you draw the line? Let me hear your comments, or do you even care???

Christopher Winkler
DefendThyself.com

I am watching the election results with amazement. While it’s far from over, Ron Paul does not seem to have any states locked up. This is sad, since a vote for any other candidate will be at least one, if not all of the following: higher taxes, more & more bigger government, Patriot Act III, IV, V, VI, and VIII, massive gun control, RF id chipping of fringe people, then YOU, increased surveillance, bigger & bigger government, nothing done about the bogus ponzi scheme called SSI, and include all the Medi stuff, and did I mention much bigger wasteful, sloth like Govenment that will force you to buy insurance, even if you can’t afford it, and well, you get the picture.

Toss in the trillions for our global wars on everything, and Ben Bernanke needs to keep the presses running 24/7. Just read that they printed up a “fresh” batch of paper to pass on to you. Hopefully we won’t end up like the Germans did in 1923…

The German Hyperinflation, 1923
Excerpt from Paper Money by “Adam Smith,” (George J.W. Goodman), pp. 57-62.

Before World War I Germany was a prosperous country, with a gold-backed currency, expanding industry, and world leadership in optics, chemicals, and machinery. The German Mark, the British shilling, the French franc, and the Italian lira all had about equal value, and all were exchanged four or five to the dollar. That was in 1914. In 1923, at the most fevered moment of the German hyperinflation, the exchange rate between the dollar and the Mark was one trillion Marks to one dollar, and a wheelbarrow full of money would not even buy a newspaper. Most Germans were taken by surprise by the financial tornado.

“My father was a lawyer,” says Walter Levy, an internationally known German-born oil consultant in New York, “and he had taken out an insurance policy in 1903, and every month he had made the payments faithfully. It was a 20-year policy, and when it came due, he cashed it in and bought a single loaf of bread.” The Berlin publisher Leopold Ullstein wrote that an American visitor tipped their cook one dollar. The family convened, and it was decided that a trust fund should be set up in a Berlin bank with the cook as beneficiary, the bank to administer and invest the dollar.

In retrospect, you can trace the steps to hyperinflation, but some of the reasons remain cloudy. Germany abandoned the gold backing of its currency in 1914. The war was expected to be short, so it was financed by government borrowing, not by savings and taxation. In Germany prices doubled between 1914 and 1919.

It’s obvious there is no clear leader in this race, and if Romney is tired of spending money, or the one of the other 2 drop out, Ron Paul will be able to hang in there until the end due to his money bomb raising ability. I have not hit my maximum yet, and while I would never push this on you, if you feel the same, toss him a few bucks, and maybe, just maybe, we can save what’s left of the Republic…

Christopher Winkler
Provider of Self Defense Products
http://DefendThyself.com